A long-awaited restoration plan for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP) to address land and forests that were disrupted by the project before it was cancelled in July was filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on January 4. The filing was in response to a formal request by FERC on October 27.
China gas deal with WV generates more questions than answers
- – Charleston Gazette-Mail – 11/9/17
Governor responds to pipeline questions
- – The Recorder – 11/2/17
Court ruling highlights unanswered questions on Mountain Valley Pipeline
- – Charleston Gazette-Mail – 10/17/17
Editorial: Two questions about the pending pipeline decision
- – The Roanoke Times – 6/20/17
Diverse DEIS Comments Raise Serious Questions About ACP
“Incomplete” and “go back to the drawing board” were sentiments most commonly echoed in the comments filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline over the past two weeks.
County weighs in on planned pipeline
- – The Recorder – 4/6/17
Things are getting real around here
- – The Recorder – 4/6/17
Augusta Board of Supervisors Raises Serious Questions With DEIS
The many deficiencies of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) were strongly criticized in a March 28 letter to Cheryl A. LaFleur, Acting Chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, by the Augusta County, VA Board of Supervisors.
FERC Raises New Questions With MVP, Delaying a Final DEIS
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has posed an array of new questions about the proposed Mountain Valley Pipeline that will necessitate a delay in the release of a final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. The comment period for the draft EIS ended in December and a final EIS had been scheduled to be released by March 10.